AsianLII [Home] [Databases] [WorldLII] [Search] [Feedback]

Laws of the People's Republic of China

You are here:  AsianLII >> Databases >> Laws of the People's Republic of China >> RULES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PATENT LAW

[Database Search] [Name Search] [Noteup] [Help]


RULES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PATENT LAW

Category  INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHT Organ of Promulgation  The State Council Status of Effect  With An Amendment Existing
Date of Promulgation  1985-01-19 Effective Date  1985-04-01  

Rules for Implementation of the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China



Chapter I  General Provisions
Chapter II  Application for Patent
Chapter III  Examination and Approval of Patent Applications
Chapter IV  Invalidation of Patent Right
Chapter V  Compulsory License for Exploitation of a Patent
Chapter VI  Rewards to Inventor or Designer of Job-Related
Chapter VII  Patent Administrative Authorities
Chapter VIII  Patent Register and Patent Gazette
Chapter IX  Fees
Chapter X  Supplementary Provisions

(Approved by the State Council and promulgated by the Patent Office of

the People's Republic of China on January 19, 1985) (Editor's Note: For the
revised text, see Rules for Implementation of the Patent Law of the People's
Republic of China approved and amended by the State Council on December 12,
1992 and promulgated by Decree No.3 of the Patent Office of the People's
Republic of China on December 21, 1992)
Chapter I  General Provisions

    Article 1  These Rules are formulated in accordance with the provisions
of Article 68 of the Patent Law of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter
referred to as "the Patent Law").

    Article 2  "Invention" in the Patent Law means any new technical solution
relating to a product, a process or an improvement thereof.

    "Utility model" in the Patent Law means any new technical solution
relating to the shape, the structure, or their combination, of a product,
which is fit for practical use.

    "Design" in the Patent Law means any new design of the shape, pattern,
colour, or their combination, of a product, which creates an aesthetic feeling
and is fit for industrial application.

    Article 3  All the procedures provided for by the Patent Law and these
Rules shall be conducted in a written form.

    Article 4  Any document submitted under the Patent Law and these Rules
shall be in Chinese. The standard scientific and technical terms shall be used
whenever there are such standard terms as prescribed by the State. Where no
generally accepted translation in Chinese can be found for the name of a
foreigner or a foreign locality or a foreign scientific or technical term, the
one in the original language shall be also indicated.

    Where any certificate or certifying document which is submitted in
accordance with the Patent Law or these Rules is in a foreign language, the
Patent Office may require that a Chinese translation be also submitted within
a specified time limit.

    Article 5  For any document mailed by the Patent Office to the addressee
residing in any of the municipalities directly under the people's governments
of provinces, autonomous regions or above, the 8th day from the date of
mailing, shall be presumed to be the receiving date, and for that mailed to
the addressee residing in any of the other places, the 16th day from the date
of mailing shall be so presumed.

    For any document sent to the Patent Office by the applicant by mail, the
date of mailing indicated by the postmark shall be the date of filing. If the
date of mailing indicated by the postmark on the envelope is not readable, the
date on which the Patent Office receives the document shall be presumed to be
the date of filing, except where the date of mailing is proved by the
applicant.

    Article 6  The first day of any time limit prescribed in the Patent Law or
these Rules shall not be counted. Where a time limit is counted by year or by
month, it shall expire on the corresponding day of the last month; if there is
no corresponding day in that month, the time limit shall expire on the last
day of that month.    If a time limit expires on an official holiday, the time limit shall
expire on the first working day after that official holiday.

    Article 7  Where a time limit prescribed in the Patent Law or these Rules
or specified by the Patent Office is not met because of force majeure or any
other justifiable reason, the applicant, the patentee or any other interested
party may, within one month from the day on which the impediment is removed,
state the reasons and request for an extension of the time limit, with the
exception of the time limits prescribed in Article 24, Article 29, the first
sentence of Article 41, Article 45 and Article 61 of the Patent Law.

    Before the expiration of any time limit specified by the Patent Office, an
applicant who, on the basis of a justified reason, wishes to have the time
limit extended may make a request, accompanied with relevant proof, to the
Patent Office.

    Article 8  Where the invention-creation for which a patent is applied by a
unit of the national defense system relates to the security of the State and
is required to be kept secret, the application for patent shall be filed with
the patent organization set up by the competent department of science and
technology of national defense. The Patent Office shall make a decision on the
basis of the observations on the examination of the application presented by
the said patent organization.

    Article 9  Subject to the preceding Article, the Patent Office, after
receiving an application for patent which is required to be examined for the
purpose of security, shall send it to the competent department concerned of
the State Council for examination. The said department shall, within 4 months
from the receipt of the application, send a report on the results of the
examination to the Patent Office. Where the invention-creation for which a
patent is applied is required to be kept secret, the Patent Office shall
handle it as a secret application for patent and notify the applicant
accordingly.

    Article 10  A job-related invention-creation made by any person in
execution of the tasks of the unit to which he belongs as mentioned in Article
6 of the Patent Law, refers to invention-creation made

    (1) in the course of performing his own duty;

    (2) in the execution of any task, other than his own duty, which was
entrusted to him by the unit to which he belongs;

    (3) within 1 year from his resignation, retirement or change of work,
where the invention-creation relates to his own duty or the other task
entrusted to him by the unit to which he previously belonged.

    Material resources of the unit, as mentioned in Article 6 of the Patent
Law, refer to the unit's money, equipment, spare parts, raw materials, or
technical data which are not to be disclosed to the public.

    Article 11  An inventor or designer as mentioned in the Patent Law refers
to any person who has made creative contributions to the substantive features
of the invention-creation. Any person who, in the course of accomplishing the
invention-creation, is responsible only for organizational work, or who offers
facilities for making use of material resources, or who takes part in other
auxiliary services, shall not be regarded as inventors or designers.

    Article 12  Two or more applicants who file, on the same day, applications
for patent on the same invention-creation, as provided for in Article 9 of the
Patent Law, shall, after receiving a notification from the Patent Office, hold
consultation among themselves so as to decide who shall be the applicant.

    Article 13  The patentee who has concluded any licensing contract for
exploitation of the patent with another party shall, within 3 months from the
entry into force of the contract, submit the contract to the Patent Office for
the record.

    Article 14  The patent agencies as mentioned in Paragraph 1, Article 19,
and Article 20, of the Patent Law refer to the China Council for the Promotion
of international Trade, the Shanghai Patent Agency, the China Patent Ltd. and
other patent agencies designated by the State Council.

    Article 15  Any applicant who entrusts a patent agency to file an
application for a patent or deal with other patent matters with the Patent
Office, shall submit at the same time a power of attorney which shall indicate
the scope of the power entrusted.
Chapter II  Application for Patent

    Article 16  Anyone who applies for a patent shall submit application
documents in duplicate.

    Article 17  Other related matters to be stated in a written request as
mentioned in Paragraph 2, Article 26, of the Patent Law refer to:

    (1) the nationality of the applicant;

    (2) where the applicant is an enterprise or other organization, the name
of the country in which the applicant has its head office;

    (3) where the applicant has entrusted a patent agency, the name and
address of the patent agency and the name of the patent agent;

    (4) where the applicant is a unit, the name of its representative;

    (5) where the priority is claimed, the relevant matters which shall be
indicated;

    (6) the signature or the seal of the applicant;

    (7) a list of the documents constituting the application;

    (8) a list of the documents appending the application.

    Where there are two or more applicants and where they have not entrusted a
patent agency, they shall designate a representative; if no representative is
designated, the applicant first signed shall be considered as the
representative.

    Where an application for a patent on a design is filed, a brief
description of the design shall, when necessary, be included.

    Article 18  Except where the nature of the invention or utility model
calls for a different mode and order of presentation, the description of an
application for a patent for invention or utility model shall, in the
following order:

    (1) state the title of the invention or utility model as appearing in
the request;

    (2) specify the technical field to which the invention or utility model
relates;

    (3) indicate the existing technology which, as far as known to the
applicant, can be regarded as useful for the understanding, searching and
examination of the invention or utility model, and cite the documents
reflecting such technology;

    (4) specify the objective which the invention or utility model is
designed to achieve;

    (5) disclose the invention or utility model in a manner sufficiently
clear and complete so that an ordinary technician in the relevant field of
technology can carry it out;

    (6) state the merits or effective results of the invention or utility
model as compared with the prior art;

    (7) briefly describe the figures in the drawings, if any;

    (8) describe in detail the best mode contemplated by the applicant for
carrying out the invention or utility model, with reference to the drawing, if
any.

    The description of the invention or utility model may contain chemical or
mathematical formulae but no commercial advertising.

    Article 19  The same sheet of drawings may contain several figures of the
invention or utility model. The figures shall be numbered consecutively in
Arabic numerals and arranged in numerical order.

    The scale and the distinctness of the drawings shall be such that a
reproduction with a linear reduction in size to two-thirds will still enable
all details to be clearly distinguished.

    Reference signs used in the drawings of an application shall be consistent
throughout. Reference signs not appearing in the description of the invention
or utility model shall not appear in the drawings.

    The drawings shall not contain any other explanatory notes, except words
which are indispensable.

    Article 20  The claims shall define clearly and concisely the matter for
which protection is sought in terms of the technical features of the invention
or utility model.

    If there are several claims, they shall be numbered consecutively in
Arabic numerals.

    The technical terminology used in the claims shall be consistent with that
used in the description. The claims may contain chemical or mathematical
formulae but no drawings. They shall not, except where absolutely necessary,
contain such references to the description or drawing "as described in part...
of the description", or "as illustrated in figure... of the drawings".

    Article 21  Claims may be independent or dependent.

    An independent claim shall outline the essential technical contents of an
invention or utility model and describe the indispensable technical features
constituting the invention or utility model.

    A dependent claim relying on the reference to one or more other claims
shall refer only to the preceding claim or claims.

    Article 22  Except where the nature of the invention or utility model
calls for other forms of expression, an independent claim shall be presented in
the following form:

    (1) a preamble indicating the technical field to which the invention or
utility model pertains and the technical features of the prior art which
relate closely to the subject matter of the invention or utility model;

    (2) a characterizing portion, stating, in such words as "the invention (or
utility model) is characterized in that..." or in similarly concise
expressions, the technical features of the invention or utility model, which,
in combination with the features stated in the preamble, constitute those to
be protected.

    Each invention or utility model shall have only one independent claim,
which shall precede all the dependent claims relating to the same invention or
utility model.

    Article 23  Except where the nature of the invention or utility model
calls for other forms expression, a dependent claim shall be presented in the
following form:

    (1) a reference portion, indicating the serial number(s) of the claim(s)
referred to. Where possible, the reference to the serial number shall be
placed at the beginning of the claim(s);

    (2) a characterizing portion, which by stating the additional technical
features of the invention or utility model, further defines the technical
features cited in the reference portion.

    Dependent claims referring to more than two other claims shall not serve
as reference to each other.

    Article 24  The abstract shall indicate the technical field to which the
invention or utility model pertains, the technical problems to be solved, the
essential technical features and the use or uses of the invention or utility model. The abstract may, where applicable, contain the chemical formula or the
figure which best characterizes the invention or utility model. The whole text
of the abstract shall contain preferably not more than 200 words.

    Article 25  Where an application for a patent for invention concerns a
micro-biological process or a product thereof and involves the use of a
micro-organism which is not available to the public, the applicant shall, in
addition to the other requirements provided for in the Patent Law and these
Rules,

    (1) deposit a sample of the micro-organism with a depositary institution
designated by the Patent Office before the date of filing, or, at the latest,
on the date of filing;

    (2) give in the application document relevant information of the
characteristics of the micro-organism;

    (3) indicate in the request the scientific name (with its Latin name) and
the name of the depositary institution, the date on which the sample of the
micro-organism was deposited and the file number of the deposit, and submit a
receipt of deposit from that institution.

    Article 26  After the publication of an application for a patent for
invention relating to a micro-organism, any unit or individual which or who
intends to make use of the micro-organism mentioned in the application for the
purpose of experiment shall make a request to the Patent Office containing the
following:

    (1) the name and address of the unit or individual making the request;

    (2) an undertaking by the unit or individual making the request not to
make the micro-organism available to any other person;

    (3) an undertaking to use the micro-organism for experimental purpose only
before the grant of the patent right.

    Article 27  The size of drawings or photographs of a design submitted in
accordance with the provisions of Article 27 of the Patent Law shall not be
smaller than 3 cm x 8 cm, nor larger than 19 cm x 27 cm.

    The applicant may submit for each design drawings or photographs of
difierent angles, sides or positions so as to clearly show the object for
which protection is sought. The applicant shall indicate on each drawing or
photograph the angle, side or position, and mark on the top left and right of
the back of drawing or photograph its consecutive number and the name of the
applicant.

    Article 28  Where an application for a patent for design seeking
protection of colours is filed, a drawing or photograph in colour, and a
drawing or photograph in white and black, shall be submitted, and a statement
of the colours for which protection is sought shall be made on the drawing or
photograph in white and black.

    Article 29  Where the Patent Office finds it necessary, it may require the
applicant for a patent on design to submit a sample or model of the product
incorporating the design. The volume of the sample or model submitted shall
not exceed 30 cm x 30 cm x 30 cm, and its weight shall not surpass 15 kilos.
Articles easily perishable or fragile, or articles that are dangerous shall
not be submitted as sample or model.

    Article 30  Academic or technical conferences mentioned in Item (2) of
Article 24 of the Patent Law mean any academic or technical conference
organized by a competent department concerned of the State Council or by a
national academic association.

    Article 31  Where any application for a patent fails under the provisions
of Item (1) or Item (2) of Article 24 of the Patent Law, the applicant shall,
when filing the application, make a declaration and, within a time limit of 2
months from the date of filing, submit a certificate issued by the unit which organized the international exhibition or academic or technical conference,
stating that the invention-creation was in fact exhibited or made public there
and also the date of its exhibition or making public.

    Where any application for a patent falls under the provisions of item (3)
of Article 24 of the Patent Law, the Patent Office may, when necessary,
require the applicant to submit the relevant proof.

    Article 32  Where the applicant for a patent on invention claims priority,
it or he shall, within 15 months from the date on which it or he first filed
the application in a foreign country, submit the filing number accorded by
that country.

    Article 33  Where two or more priorities are claimed for an application
for a patent, the priority period for the application shall be calculated from
the earliest priority date.

    Article 34  Where an application for a patent is filed by any foreigner,
foreign enterprise or other foreign organization having no habitual residence
or business office in China, the Patent Office may, when there is any doubt,
require the applicant to submit the following documents:

    (1) a certificate concerning the nationality of the applicant;

    (2) a certificate concerning the seat of the headquarters of a foreign
enterprise or other foreign organization;

    (3) a testimonial showing that the country, to which the foreigner,
foreign enterprise or other foreign organization belongs, recognizes that
Chinese citizens or units are, under the same conditions applied to its
nationals, entitled to patent rights and other related rights in that country.

    Article 35  According to the provisions in Paragraph 1, Article 31 of the
Patent Law, the claims in a patent application for an invention or utility
model may be any of the following:

    (1) two or more independent claims of the same category of product or
process, which cannot be included in one claim;

    (2) an independent claim for a product as well as for the process
specially adopted for the manufacture of that product;

    (3) an independent claim for a product as well as for the use of that
product;

    (4) an independent claim for a product, the process specially adopted for
the manufacture of that product as well as for the use of that product;

    (5) an independent claim for a product, the process specially adopted for
the manufacture of that product, as well as for the equipment specially
designed for carrying out the process;

    (6) an independent claim for a process as well as for the equipment
specially designed for carrying out that process;

    (7) an independent claim for a process as well as for the product directly
manufactured by carrying out that process.

    Article 36  Where a patent application for a design contains two or more
designs in accordance with the provisions in Paragraph 2, Article 31 of the
Patent Law, the designs shall be numbered consecutively and the products
incorporating the designs shall be indicated in the request of the
application. The consecutive numbers shall be marked on the bottom left of the
back of the drawings or photographs of the design.

    Article 37  When withdrawing a patent application, the applicant shall
submit to the Patent Offfice a declaration stating the title of the
invention-creation, the filing number and the date of filing.

    Where a declaration to withdraw the patent application is submitted after
the printing preparation has been done by the Patent Office for publication of
the application documents, the application shall be published as scheduled.
Chapter III  Examination and Approval of Patent Applications

    Article 38  In any of the following cases, an examiner or a member of the
Patent Reexamination Board shall, on his own initiative or upon the request
of the applicant or any other interested party, withdraw from his office:

    (1) where he is a close relative of the applicant or the patent agent;

    (2) where he has an interest in the patent application;

    (3) where he has such other kinds of relations with the applicant or the
patent agent that might influence the impartial examination of the application.

    Where a member of the Patent Reexamination Board has taken part in the
examination of the application, the provisions of the preceding paragraph
shall apply.

    Article 39  Upon the receipt of a written request, a description (a
drawing being indispensable for utility model) and one or more claims for a
patent for an invention or utility model, or a written request and one or more
drawings or photographs showing the design for a patent application for
design, the Patent Office shall accord the date of filing and a filing number,
and notify them to the applicant.

    Article 40  If the application documents submitted do not contain a
request or a description or claims, or if they are not in conformity with the
provisions of Article 27 of the Patent Law, the Patent Office shall reject the
application and notify the applicant accordingly.

    Article 41  Where the description of an invention mentions that it
contains "explanatory notes to the drawings" but the drawings are missing, the
applicant shall, within the time limit specified by the Patent Office, either
furnish the drawings or make a declaration for the deletion of the
"explanatory notes to the drawings". If the drawings are submitted later, the
date of their delivery at, or mailing to, the Patent Office shall be the date
of filing of the application; if the "explanatory notes of the drawings" are
deleted, the original date of filing shall be retained.

    Article 42  Where an application for a patent contains two or more
inventions, utility models or designs, the applicant may, at any time before
the announcement of the application under Article 39 or Article 40 of the
Patent Law, or after the said announcement at the time when the Patent Office
considers the filing of a divisional application is justified, submit to the
Patent Office a request for the division of the application and divide it on
its or his own initiative into several applications.

    If the Patent Office finds that the application for a patent is not in
conformity with the provisions of Article 31 of the Patent Law and Article 35
of these Rules, it shall require the applicant to divide the application
within a specified time limit. If, without any justified reason, the applicant
does not give any response within the time limit, the application shall be
deemed to have been withdrawn.

    Article 43  For divisional applications filed in accordance with
Article 42 of these Rules, the original date of filing of the application may
be retained, provided that they do not go beyond the scope as contained in the
original description.

    Article 44  Where, upon preliminary examination, the Patent Office finds
that a patent application obviously fails under Article 3 or Article 25 of the
Patent Law, or is obviously not in conformity with Article 18 or Article 19 of
the Patent Law or Article 2 of these Rules, it shall require the applicant to
present its or his observations within a specified time limit. If the
applicant, without any justified reason, fails to meet the time limit for
presenting observations, the application shall be deemed to have been
withdrawn.

    Where, after the applicant has made the observations, the Patent Office
still finds that the application is obviously not in conformity with the
provisions of the articles cited in the preceding paragraph, the application
shall be rejected.

    Article 45  Where a patent application belongs to any of the following
cases, the applicant shall, within a time limit specified by the Patent
Office, make due rectification:

    (1) the written request is not presented in the prescribed form or the
indications therein are not in conformity with the requirements;    (2) the description and its drawings or the claims of the invention or
utility model are not in conformity with the relevant provisions;

    (3) the patent application for an invention or utility model does not
contain an abstract;

    (4) the drawings or photographs contained in the patent application for a
design are not in conformity with the relevant provisions;

    (5) a patent agency is entrusted, but no power of attorney is submitted;

    (6) any other deficiencies which call for rectifications.

    If the applicant, without any justified reason, fails to meet the time
limit for rectifying the deficiencies, the application shall be deemded to
have been withdrawn. If, after the rectification, the patent application is
still not in conformity with the relevant provisions of the Patent Law or
these Rules, it shall be rejected.

    Article 46  Where the applicant requests for an earlier publication of its
or his patent application for an invention, a declaration shall be made to the
Patent Office. The Patent Office shall publish the said application
immediately after a preliminary examination unless it is to be rejected.

    Article 47  The applicant shall, when indicating, in accordance with
Article 27 of the Patent Law, the product incorporating the design and the
category to which that product belongs, refer to the classification of
products for designs published by the Patent Office. Where no indication or an
incorrect indication, of the category to which the product incorporating the
design belongs is made, the Patent Office may provide the indication or
correct it.

    Article 48  Any person may, from the date of the publication of a patent
application for an invention till the date of the announcement of the approval
after examination, submit, to the Patent Office, observations, with the
reasons therefor, on the application which is not in conformity with the
provisions of the Patent Law.

    Article 49  Where the applicant for an invention patent cannot furnish,
for justified reason, the documents concerning any retrieval or the results of
any examination under Article 36 of the Patent Law, it or he shall make a
statement to that effect and submit them when the said documents and results
are available.

    Article 50  The Patent Office shall, when carrying out, of its own accord,
examination of an application for an invention patent in accordance with the
provisions in Paragraph 2, Article 35 of the Patent Law, notify the applicant
accordingly.

    Article 51  Within a period of 15 months from the date of filing or at the
time when a request for a substantive examination is made, or when a response
is made in regard to a challenge, the applicant for an invention patent may
amend the description or the claims of the application for invention patent on
its or his own initiative.

    When an amendment of the description or the claims in a patent application
for invention or utility model is made, a replacement sheet in prescribed form
shall be submitted, unless the amendment concerns only the alteration,
insertion or deletion of a few words.

    Article 52  The applicant for a patent for utility model or design may,
from the date of filing till the date of announcement of the patent
application, or at the time when a response is made in regard to challenge,
amend its or his application on its or his own initiative. Where an amendment
to an application for design patent is made, it shall not change the essential
elements of the design.

    Article 53  The circumstances under which an application for patent shall
be rejected by the Patent Office are as follows:

    (1) where the application does not comply with the provisions of Article 3
of the Patent Law and Article 2 of these Rules;

    (2) where the application falls under the provisions of Article 5 or
Article 25 of the Patent Law, or it does not comply with the provisions of
Article 22 or Article 23 of the Patent Law;

    (3) where the applicant has no right to apply for a patent according to
the provisions of Article 6, Article 8 or Article 18 of the Patent Law, or
cannot obtain a patent right according to the provisions of Article 9 of the
Patent Law;

    (4) where the application does not comply with the provisions in Paragraph
3 or Paragraph 4, of Article 26, or Article 31 of the Patent Law;

    (5) where the amendments to the application or the divisional applications
go beyond the scope as contained in the original description.

    Article 54  The circumstances under which an opposition may be filed under
Article 41 of the Patent Law with regard to a patent application for invention
or utility model, which has been publicly announced by the Patent Oficice,
shall comprise the following:

    (1) where the invention for which a patent is applied does not comply with
the provisions of Article 3 of the Patent Law and of Paragraph 1, Article 2,
of these Rules, or the utility model for which a patent is applied does not
comply with the provision of Article 3 of the Patent Law and of Paragraph 2,  
Article 2, of these Rules;

    (2) where the application falls under the provisions of Article 5 or
Article 25 of the Patent Law, or it does not comply with the provisions of
Article 22 of the Patent Law;

    (3) where the applicant has no right to apply for a patent according to
Article 6, Article 8 or Article 18 of the Patent Law, or the essential
elements of the application have been taken from the descriptions, drawings,
models, equipment, etc., of another person, or from a process used by another
person, without his consent;

    (4) where the application does not comply with the provisions of Paragraph
3 or Paragraph 4 of Article 26, of the Patent Law;

    (5) where the amendments to the application or the divisional applications
go beyond the scope as contained in the original description.

    Article 55  The circumstances under which challenge may be filed under
Article 41 of the Patent Law with regard to an application for a design
patent, which has been publicly announced by the Patent Office, shall comprise
the following:

    (1) where the design for which a patent is applied does not comply with
the provisions of Article 3 of the Patent Law and of Paragraph 3, Article 2,
of these Rules;

    (2) where the design for which a patent is applied falls under the
provisions of Article 5 of the Patent Law, or does not comply with the
provisions of Article 23 of the Patent Law;

    (3) where the applicant has no right to apply for a patent according to
Article 6, Article 8 or Article 18 of the Patent Law, or cannot obtain a
patent right according to Article 9 of the Patent Law, or the essential
elements of the design have been taken from the designs, drawings,
photographs, articles or models of another person without his consent;

    (4) where the amendments to the application have changed the essential
elements of the design.

    Article 56  Anyone who files challenge in accordance with the provisions
of Article 41 of the Patent Law shall submit same, with the reasons therefor,
in duplicate to the Patent Office.

    Article 57  After the receipt of the challenge, the Patent Office shall
make an examination of it. Where the challenge does not conform to the
prescribed requirements, the Patent Office shall notify the opponent for a
rectification within a specified time limit. If the opponent fails to rectify
the opposition within the specified time limit, the challenge shall be deemed
not to have been filed.

    Where the reasons for opposition are not stated, or the reasons for
opposition do not conform to the provisions of Article 54 or Article 55 of
these Rules, the challenge shall not be accepted.

    Article 58  The Patent Reexamination Board shall consist of experienced
technical and legal experts designated by the Patent Office. The
Director-General of the Patent Office shall be the Chairman of the Board
concurrently.

    Article 59  Where an applicant requests the Patent Reexamination Board to
make a reexamination in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 1, Article
43, of the Patent Law, it or he shall file a request for reexamination
and state the reasons therefor, together with the relevant supporting
documents. The request and the supporting documents shall be in duplicate.

    The applicant may amend its or his application for a patent at the time
when it or he requests reexamination, but the amendments shall be limited only
to the part to which the decision of rejection of the application relates.

    Article 60  Where a request for reexamination does not comply with the
prescribed form, the person who made the request shall rectify it within a
time limit fixed by the Patent Reexamination Board. If the rectification fails
to be made within the time limit, the request for reexamination shall be
deemed to have been withdrawn.

    Article 61  The Patent Reexamination Board shall transmit the accepted
request for reexamination to the original examining department for
observation. The Patent Reexamination Board shall make a decision on the
request and notify the applicant accordingly.

    Article 62  Where the Patent Reexamination Board finds after reexamination
that the request does not comply with the provisions of the Patent Law, it
shall ask the person who has made the request for reexamination to submit his
observations within a specified time limit. If, without any justified reason,
the time limit for making response is not met, the request for reexamination
shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

    Article 63  At any time before the Patent Reexamination Board makes a
decision on a request for reexamination, the person who has made the request
for reexamination may withdraw his request.

    Article 64  The Patent Office shall, after making a decision to grant the
patent right, notify the applicant to pay a fee for a patent certificate
within 2 months and receive the certificate. Where the applicant fails to pay
the fee within the time limit, it or he shall be deemed to have abandoned its
or his right to obtain the patent right.
Chapter IV  Invalidation of Patent Right

    Article 65  Anyone making a request for invalidation or partial
invalidation of a patent right according to the provisions of Article 48 of
the Patent Law shall submit a request, with the reasons therefor, to the
Patent Reexamination Board. Where necessary, relevant documents shall be
submitted. The request and the relevant documents shall be in duplicate.

    Article 66  Where the request for invalidation of the patent right does
not comply with the prescribed form, the person who made the request shall
rectify it within a time limit fixed by the Patent Reexamination Board. If the
rectification fails to be made within the time limit, the request for
invalidation shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

    The provisions of Article 54 or Article 55 of these Rules shall be applied
so far as the reasons for the request for invalidation of the patent right are
concerned.

    Where no reasons have been stated in the request for invalidation or where
the reasons stated do not comply with the provisions of Article 54 or Article
55 of these Rules, the request shall not be accepted.

    Article 67  The Patent Reexamination Board shall send a copy of the
request for invalidation of the patent right and a copy of the relevant
documents to the patentee and ask it or him to present its or his observations
within a specified time limit. Where, without any justified reasons, no
response is made within the time limit, the patentee shall be deemed to have
no objection.
Chapter V  Compulsory License for Exploitation of a Patent

    Article 68  Any unit requesting, in accordance with the provisions of
Article 52 of the Patent Law, or any patentee requesting, under Article 53 of
the Patent Law, a compulsory license for exploitation of a patent for
invention or utility model, shall submit to the Patent Office a request for
compulsory license, and supporting documents to show that it or he has not
been able to conclude with the patentee a license contract for exploitation on
resonable terms. The request and the supporting documents shall be in
duplicate.

    Any unit requesting, in accordance with the provisions of Article 52 of
the Patent Law, a compulsory license for exploitation of a patent for
invention or utility model, shall at the same time furnish documents in
duplicate to show that it is in a position to exploit the patent.

    The Patent Office shall, after the receipt of the request for a compulsory
license, ask the patentee concerned to present its or his observations within
a specified time limit; where, without any justified reason, no response is
made within the time limit, the patentee shall be deemed to have no objection.

    The Patent Office shall, after having examined the request for compulsory
license and the observations of the patentee, make a decision and notify the
party which made the request and the patentee concerned.

    Article 69  For any request, put forward in accordance with the provisions
of Article 57 of the Patent Law for a ruling by the Patent Office on the fees
for exploitation, the party concerned shall submit a request in writing and
furnish documents showing that the parties have not been able to conclude an
agreement in respect of the amount of the fees. The Patent Office shall, after
the receipt of the request, make a ruling within 3 months and notify the
interested parties accordingly.
Chapter VI  Rewards to Inventor or Designer of Job-Related
Invention-creation

    Article 70  "Rewards" mentioned in Article 16 of the Patent Law includes
pecuniary rewards and remunerations which are to be awarded to inventors and
designers.

    Article 71  Any unit holding a patent right shall, after the grant of the
patent right, award inventors or designer of a job-related invention-creation
with a sum of money as reward. The sum of pecuniary reward for a patent for
invention shall not be less than 200 yuan; the sum of pecuniary reward for a
patent for utility model or design shall not be less than 50 yuan.

    Where an invention-creation was made on the basis of an inventor's or
designer's proposal adopted by the unit to which he belongs, after the grant
of the patent right, the unit holding it shall award him with a more liberal
pecuniary reward.

    Any enterprise holding the patent right may include the said money reward
into its production cost; any institution holding the patent right may
disburse the said money reward out of its operating expenses.

    Article 72  Any unit holding a patent right shall, after exploiting the
patent for invention-creation within the term of the patent right, draw each
year from any increase in profits after taxation a percentage of 0.5%-2% due
to the exploitation of an invention or utility model, or a percentage of
0.05%-0.2% due to the exploitation of a design, and award it to the
inventor or designer as remuneration. The unit may, otherwise, by making
reference to the said percentages, award the inventor or designer in a lump
sum.

    Article 73  Where any unit holding a patent right for invention-creation
authorizes other units or indviduals to exploit the patent, it shall, after
taxation, draw a percentage of 5%-10% from the fees for exploitation it
received and award it to the inventor or designer as remuneration.

    Article 74  The remunerations provided for in these Rules shall all be
disbursed out of the profits derived from the making of patented products or
the use of patented process and out of the fees obtained for the exploitation
of the patents. The remunerations shall not be included in the normal bonus
fund of the unit, nor subject to the bonus tax. But the inventor or designer
shall pay tax on his income.

    Article 75  The units under collective ownership and other enterprises
may handle rewards and remunerations for their invenors and designers with
reference to the provisions in this Chapter.
Chapter VII  Patent Administrative Authorities

    Article 76  The patent administrative authorities mentioned in Article 60
of the Patent Law and in these Rules refer to the patent administrative
authorities set up by the competent departments concerned of the State
Council, and the people's governments of the provinces, autonomous regions,
municipalities directly under the Central Government, open cities and special
economic zones.

    Article 77  Where, after the publication of a patent application for
invention and before the grant of the patent right, any unit or individual has
exploited the invention without paying appropriate fees, the patentee may,
after the grant of the right, request the relevant patent administrative
authority to intervene in the matter, or may directly file a suit in a
people's court. The patent administrative authority intervening in the matter
shall have the power to decide that the unit or individual shall pay
appropriate fees within a specified time limit. Where any of the parties
concerned is not satisfied with the decision of the said authority, it or he
may file a suit in a people's court.

    The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis in
respect of a patent application for utility model or design.

    Article 78  Where any dispute arises between any inventor or designer, and
the unit to which he belongs, as to whether an invention-creation is a
job-related invention-creation, or whether an application for a patent is to
be filed in respect of a job-related invention-creation, the inventor or
designer may request the competent department at the higher level or the
patent administrative authority of the region in which the unit is located to
handle the matter.

    Article 79  Where parties to any transdepartmental or transregional
infringement dispute request the administrative authority for patent affairs
to handle the matter, the said dispute shall be handled by the administrative
authority for patent affairs of the region in which the infringement has
arisen, or by the administrative authority for patent affairs of the higher
competent department of the infringing entity.
Chapter VIII  Patent Register and Patent Gazette

    Article 80  The Patent Office shall maintain a Patent Register in which
shall be recorded the following matters relating to any patent right:

    (1) grant of a patent right;

    (2) assignment of a patent right;

    (3) renewal of the term of a patent right;

    (4) termination and invalidation of a patent right;

    (5) compulsory license for exploitation of a patent;

    (6) changes in the name, nationality and address of a patentee.

    Article 81  The Patent Office shall publish the Patent Gazette at regular
intervals, publishing or announcing the following:

    (1) bibliographic data contained in a written request for a patent
application;

    (2) abstract of the description of an invention or utility model;

    (3) request for substantive examination of an application for invention
patent and the decision made by the Patent Office to carry out, of its own
accord, the substantive examination of that application for invention patent;

    (4) approval after examination of a patent application for invention and
announcement of the patent application for utility model or design;

    (5) rejection of a patent application;

    (6) decision concerning an opposition and amendment made in a patent
application;

    (7) grant of a patent right;

    (8) termination of a patent right;

    (9) invalidation of a patent right;

    (10) assignment of a patent right;

    (11) grant of compulsory license for exploitation of a patent;

    (12) renewal of the term of a patent;

    (13) withdrawal of a patent application, or an application deemed to have
been withdrawn or abandonment of an application;

    (14) changes in the name or address of a patentee;

    (15) notification to an applicant whose address is not known;

    (16) any other related matters.

    The description, its drawings and the claims of a patent application for
invention or utility model, and drawings or photographs of a patent
application for design shall be published in full.
Chapter IX  Fees

    Article 82  The fees which shall be paid when a patent application is
filed, or when other procedures are gone through with the Patent Office, are
as follows:

    (1) application fee and application maintenance fee;

    (2) examination fee, reexamination fee and opposition fee;

    (3) annual fee;

    (4) fees for handling other patent matters: fee for renewal of the term of
a patent, fee for a change in the bibliographic data, patent certificate fee,
fee for the proof of priority, fee for a request for invalidation, fee for a
request for compulsory license, and fee for a request for a ruling on
exploitation fee of a compulsory license.

    The amount of the fees listed above shall be prescribed by the Patent
Office separately.

    Article 83  Fees provided for in the Patent Law and in these Rules may be
paid to the Patent Office through a bank or by postal remittance. They may
also be paid directly to the Patent Office.    Where fees are paid through a bank or by postal remittance, the kind of
fees, the title of the invention-creation, the filing number or the patent
number shall be indicated on the money order. In case where no filing number
or patent number has been accorded, the date of application shall be indicated.

    Where fees are paid through a bank or by postal remittance, the date on
which the transfer of such fees are ordered shall be the date of payment.

    Article 84  Where the patent application fee is not paid on time, or only
a portion of the fee is paid, the applicant may pay the fee or to make up the
balance within one month from the date of filing the application. If the fee
is not paid or the balance is not made up within the time limit, the
application shall be deemed to have been withdrawn.

    Article 85  Where the prescribed fees are not paid when an applicant
requests substantive examination, or reexamination, or when any person files
an opposition or requests an invalidation of a patent right, the fees may be
paid within 15 days from the date on which the request is made or the
opposition is filed, but the date of payment may not go beyond the time limit
the Patent Law prescribes for the request for substantive examination or
reexamination or for the opposition to be filed. If the payment is not made
within the time limit, the request is deemed to have not been made or the
opposition is deemed to have not been filed.

    Article 86  Where the applicant for an invention patent has not been
granted a patent right within 2 years from the date of filing, it or he shall
pay an annual fee for the maintenance of the application from the third year.
The first annual maintenance fee shall be paid within the first month of the
third year. The subsequent annual maintenance fees shall be paid in advance
within the last month before the expiration of the preceding year.

    Article 87  The first annual fee shall be paid when the patent certificate
is issued. Where the maintenance fee of the application for the year has
already been paid at the time of the grant of a patent right, the patentee
shall make up the difference on the basis of the amount of the annual fee of
the same year. The subsequent annual fees shall be paid in advance within the
last month before the expiration of the preceding year.

    Article 88  Where the maintenance fee of the application or the annual fee
is not paid on time by the applicant or the patentee, or the maintenance fee
or the annual fee paid is insufficient, the Patent Office shall ask the
applicant or the patentee to pay the fee or to make up the balance within 6
months from the expiration of the time limit within which the maintenance fee
or the annual fee was to be paid. The applicant or the patentee shall at the
same time pay a surcharge which amounts to 25% of the maintenance fee or the
annual fee. Where the fees are not paid within 6 months the application shall
be deemed to have been withdrawn or the patent right shall be deemed
terminated at the expiration of the time limit within which the maintenance
fee or the annual fee was to be paid.

    Article 89  Where in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 2,
Article 45, of the Patent Law, the patentee requests the renewal of the term
of the patent for utility model or design, it or he shall make the request
within 6 months before the term expires, and at the same time pay the renewal
fee. In case where, at the expiration of the said period, the patentee fails
to pay the renewal fee, the request shall be deemed to have not been made.

    Article 90  When filing an application for a patent and going through all
the procedures, any individual who has difficulties in paying the various fees
prescribed in Article 82 of these Rules may submit a request according to the
relevant provisions to the Patent Office for a reduction or postponement of
payment.

    The measures for the reduction or postponement of payment shall be
prescribed by the Patent Office.
Chapter X  Supplementary Provisions

    Article 91  Anyone may, after approval by the Patent Office, look up or
reproduce the files of the published or announced applications for patent, the
Patent Register and related supporting documents.

    Article 92  Documents submitted to the Patent Office shall be prepared in
the form prescribed by the Patent Office and signed or sealed by the
applicant or its or his patent agent.

    Article 93  Where documents or objects relating to an application for
patent or patent right are submitted to the Patent Office, the number of the
application or the patent and the title of the invention-creation shall be
indicated. Where documents or objects are sent to the Patent Office by post,
they must be registered.

    Article 94  Any sheets constituting the application for patent shall be
typed or printed. The typing or printing shall be neat and clear, and no
alteration is allowed. Only the right side of the paper shall be used.

    Drawings shall be made in black ink with the aid of drafting instrument.
The lines in the drawings shall be uniformly thick and clear.

    Article 95  The Patent Office shall be responsible for interpreting these
Rules.

    Article 96  These Rules shall enter into force as of April 1, 1985.

                                                            



AsianLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.asianlii.org/cn/legis/cen/laws/rfiotpl410